Sunday, August 29, 2021

Death of George McKinsey in Warren County, Ohio

 Bruce Locken sent me a newspaper screen shot from the Lebanon Newspaper showing information provided by Patrick McKinsey about the estate of George McKinsey.  Patrick was the youngest child of George and I believe Patrick continued to live on the farm that he had grown up on with his father and his father's second wife, Mary Moore Lacy.  

This Newspaper information adds a puzzle to when we believe it likely that George died.  I wrote a blog post about where George is buried on my Warren County Homecoming blog:

https://quakerhomecomingwarrencountyohio.blogspot.com/2013/09/miami-meeting-house-cemetery-elizabeth.html

In this blog post I used information from a Quaker list of burials in the Hicksite cemetery at Miami Monthly Meeting which uses date of  9/7/1841for what I had believed to be burial date for George.  But this makes no sense as this newspaper article clearly has George having died before August 1840.  This is a puzzle that I can not solve at the moment....too busy at my house with Mary and her boys visiting,


Here is the URL for the blog post about where George McKinsey is buried:


Thursday, August 26, 2021

Ellot/Elliott family before 1722

Lauren who is a cousin from my Elliott branch, has found some information about very early Elliott family line that is haplogroup C.  We have chatted about the fact that she has hopes that these are our very early ancestors that are found on a genealogy site with information about Peter Elliott:

http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~ellotclan/genealogy/pafg01.htm#1287

I am having trouble jumping into this information because I don't see a link between the men who have done yDNA testing for this line and our own Jacob Elliot.  So I am trying to do a bit of looking at the parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents of Jacob.   Other researchers suggest that Jacob's parents were John and Sarah Elliot and that they may have lived first in NJ and have been a part of Burlington MM.  

So I will start with Burlington Monthly Meeting.

On the Burlington MM 

https://burlmhcc.org/history/

I found information of great interest:


History of the Meeting House

The history of the Meeting House includes a sail across the Atlantic, purchase of land from the Lenape, rebuild for gender equality and renovation for re-purposing.

1676 Burlington purchased

In 1676, representatives of the West Jersey Proprietors bought from the Lenape Nation the land where Burlington City is now and roughly 15 miles of land along the river in each direction.

1677 Meeting for Worship under sails

“Burlington, as a Friends’ settlement, is older than Philadelphia, and second only to Salem, in this part of the country. It was the ship Kent which in the year 1677 carried two hundred and thirty Friends from England, where they were suffering persecution for conscience’ sake.

True to their religious character immediate provisions were made for gatherings for worship. The sail of the ship Kent provided the first shelter.”

(Bulletin of the Friends Historical Association, Volumes 4-6).

Burlington MM is located at the red marker just up the River from Philadelphia.  In 1677 when the Kent sailed to these shores, William Penn had not yet founded Pennsylvania.  William Penn did not come to America until 1682.....five years later.



I will begin this part of my Elliott research with a look at Burlington MM and if there is a record of the early members of the MM and those who sailed on the Kent.

Several of the Ancestry trees suggest that John Elliott was born in the Province of West New Jersey in 1690.  These same trees suggest that he married Sarah in 1715 in Burlington, NJ.

This morning in October 2021, I am looking on Ancestry for leads as to how John Elliott and his wife, Sarah, arrived in Burlington, NJ.  Were both born in this location?  Do they have parents in West Jersey. i am looking at:

The Burlington Court Book: a record of Quaker Jurisprudence in New Jersey, 1680-1709.

On page xiii, the author explains that the Duke of York made over West New Jersey and Pennsylvania to the Quaker families between 1680 and 1682.  Looking in the index after skimming the introduction show no Elliott/Ellot mentions in the book.

But the question is:  How did John and Sarah get to Burlington MM?  I am starting today with Hinshaw's Encyclopedia Volume II.  Volume II is the Philadelphia Yearly meeting, but it includes New Jersey MM's.  

The first entry is found on page 27 and is a part of the entries for Salem MM.  Salem MM was established much earlier than Burlington in 1676.  You can see on the map below it is a bit farther south than 
I could find no Ellet nor Smith in the right time frame for my ancestors at this MM when I look at Hinshaw's Encyclopedia.

Again, according to Hinshaw's Encyclopedia Burlington was next to be formed:


But no information discovered that might lead to parents of either John nor Sarah.

Perhaps they were not Quaker when they first moved to the area near New Jersey?  Who else settled in the area?

In October 2021 I am again looking at Burlington MM.  This time  am looking at the copies of original records found on Ancestry....and lo and behold I find a Thomas Ellit at Burlington MM in the 10th month of  1706.  He seems to be a witness to ....hmmmm not sure....perhaps condemnation of a sin committed?




I continued to read.  From a site called Quakers in the World, I found an article called Mission Work and settlement in Colonial New Jersey.  This article mentioned the below:


The only way to travel overland between north and south was the Indian trail (later the Burlington path) through the forest.  The earliest Quakers to pass this way were Josiah Cole (from Gloucester), and his companion Thomas Thurston, in 1658. Far from being threatened, as they might have feared, they were frequently fed, sheltered and guided by the Susquehanna Indians whose home it was. 


This led me to begin reading about the Quakers in Gloucester.  


With the death of Charles II, circumstances changed again in London. The new king, James, wished to enforce a Catholic policy on the Church of England and tried to enable Roman Catholics to hold high office. Anglicans were outraged and James therefore resolved to find allies elsewhere by uniting the cause of Catholics and Dissenters.107 In March 1686, he issued a Declaration in which he expressed his wish that all his subjects might be Catholics, but for the sake of peace he would maintain the Church of England and suspend the laws against Dissenters.108 Among those released from prison were 1,200 Quakers.109

William Penn played an important part in these events. His father had been a friend of James, and although William had previously supported a campaign to exclude James, he now needed royal support to retain his charter for the colony of Pennsylvania. James, for his part, could see that Penn had useful influence among Quakers.110 It was Penn who led a deputation from the Friends’ Yearly Meeting to express thanks to James for his clemency.111 Similar deputations came from Baptists, Congregationalists and Presbyterians.112

And guess what I found?  The next paragraph talked about a John Elliott in Gloucester:  

As a result of the Declaration fifty-six Quakers were released from Gloucester county gaol and fifteen from the city gaol.113 The six Gloucester men and nine women had been imprisoned in December 1681 and had languished there for four years.114 Of the others imprisoned in 1681/2 one (Henry Riddall) had died in prison in 1685.115 John Elliott and his wife had been bailed out by relations, but at the next Assizes had been were returned to prison for refusing to be of good behaviour. After four or five weeks they had again been bailed out.116 John Elliott appears once more in the diocesan records in 1684 for refusing to pay a church rate for communion rails in his parish church.117 He was clearly undaunted by his trials. There is no recorded mention of the remaining seven prisoners.

Later in the article there is a list of the Quakers of Gloucester and John Elliott is listed as an upholsterer.

Is there a connection between this John Elliott and the John Elliott who is found in Gloucester?  And where is Gloucester?  



And then some pages later John Elliott is mentioned again: 

The severest persecution came in the period 1680–85. John Elliott and John Edmunds of Gloucester were requested to attend the Assizes in order to assist Friends278 and John Elliott and Nicholas Wastfield were charged to care for the prisoners in Gloucester, with the quarterly meeting paying any costs.279 In 1682 £8 10s. was given for the prisoners in the castle and £4 for those in the city’s north gate.280 In 1684 another 20s. was given for the prisoners in the north gate and 20s. for those from the nearby village of Westbury-on-Severn. A year later John Elliott and John Edmunds were allocated 33s. to pay for the ‘chamber rent of the poor friends in prison’ and £2 14s. for prisoners in the castle and the north gate.

Whilst the Quakers endured the persecution with courage, it was nevertheless their policy to challenge the legal correctness of the charges whenever this was possible. Petitions to judges and the king on behalf of the persecuted were frequent. The suffering of Friends was laid before the judges of Assize in Gloucester in 1677,281 and before the bishop of Gloucester in 1680. In the same year all monthly meetings were asked to write regarding the sufferings to the county’s members of parliament, and the sufferings were again laid before the judges in February 1684.282 Three months after that a petition was presented (via the yearly meeting) to both king and parliament. Following such efforts one can imagine that the quarterly meeting had considerable pleasure in drawing up an address to the king in August 1686 acknowledging his kindness ‘in stopping our persecution’.283

So this John Elliott is still in Gloucester in 1680-85.  Which would shoot my theory that he moved so early that he was already living in New Jersey when the Burlington MM was established in 1678....but in looking up this date, look what I found!  An entire list of meetings that are not indexed by Hinshaw! 

Listed below are the 10 earliest (1678-1750) Quaker Meeting Houses in Burlington County, New Jersey, in the order of their founding (sources: Joe Laufer and the Plone Foundation (in footnote))

1. Burlington MM - 1678 (#16 on map at right) - This is the only Burlington area monthly meeting records included in Hinshaw's encyclopedia, volume II. The first meetinghouse on this site was a hexagonal frame structure built in the 1600s. 
2. Rancocas MM - 1678 (#18)
3. Chesterfield MM - 1684 (#11) (subsequently named Crosswicks) - Still has a cannonball imbeded in one wall, a result of a Revolutionary War battle!
4. Moorestown MM - 1700 (#3)
5. Mount Holly MM - 1716 (#17)
6. Mount Laurel MM - 1717 (#4) - Associated with Moorestown Friends Meeting.
7. Upper Springfield MM - 1727 (#10)
8. Mansfield MM - 1731 (#14)
9. Bordentown MM - 1740 (#13)
10. Amey's Mount MM - 1743 (#9)

Again from the same source:

 Emigration

Mention needs to be made of emigration at this time. The number of Friends leaving Gloucester was not large, but the impact would have been significant since they were young and enterprising. At a time of persecution or hardship the prospect of a fresh start in the New World must have had its attractions, and for those who survived the perils of the sea,350 disease and hostile natives, there really was a land of opportunity. In the 1680s land in Pennsylvania could be purchased for 2s. 6d. per acre, and there were even better deals for larger purchases. The sum of £100 could secure 5,000 acres, and smaller parcels of land were offered at 250 acres for £5 and 500 acres for £10, albeit there was an annual ‘quit rent’ to pay.351 It is therefore no surprise that five hundred

Quaker families per year are reported to have emigrated to America between 1676 and 1700.352 ....Among them were some from Gloucester. In the sixth month of 1697 Elizabeth Webb, who became a Friend when she was nineteen, was sitting in the meeting in Gloucester when her spirit ‘was as if it had been dissolved with the love of God, and it flowed over the great ocean, and I was constrained to kneel down and pray for the seed of God in America, and the concern never went out of my mind day nor night, until I went to travel there’.3.....The proximity of Bristol made emigration easier, and it is of note that there were more emigrants to America from Bristol at this time than from any other area in England outside London.365

....It has been shown that the early Gloucester Friends were mainly tradespeople and artisans, with textile workers, as elsewhere, the largest single group.366 There were no wealthy merchants,




From the above it would seem likely that the John Elliott that I have been looking at did not emigrate?  Phooey.
When I woke up this morning I decided not to throw these ideas out.  What if this John Elliott did not emigrate to New Jersey, but he had a son also named John Elliott who did make the move?  Or even a grandson named John Elliott who did make the move?  Or a son of any name who made the move who had a son named John Elliott?  

Equally there is no mention in the extant records of any refusals to take oaths, although the issue was still important. In 1692 the Gloucestershire quarterly meeting wrote to members of parliament urging them to repeal the law requiring Friends to take oaths, and the next year letters of concern were sent to all the knights of the shire. The person entrusted to draft these letters was John Elliott of Gloucester.157

I do not have time to work on the next thoughts today, but I do not want to loose them.  Richard Guy arrived on the ship Griffin with his wife Bridget.  The ship landed 25 June 1675 at Salem on Oct 5 1675.  These passengers were traveling with John Fenwick.  I need to find out from where John Fenwick was before this trip.  There were members of a Guy family living at Bristol.  I do not know if the two families were related yet.  

Ok.,..,.another theory with holes shot in it.  John Fenwick was from Northumberland County in Great Britain which is a far north county in England....a long way from Glouster!.


Wednesday, August 25, 2021

Thomas Calvin Morrison

Ronald and I started chatting about Thomas Calvin Morrison last night at the Morrison h2 yDNA group zoom meeting.  We started brainstorming about what we know about Thomas Calvin Morrison and what we think possible in figuring him out.

So the next information is from Ronald and he says it is iffy,  It is possible that Thomas Calvin Morrison had father Samuel Douglas Morrison.  My first thought is that is an odd name for William and Rachel Witcher to have named a possible first born son.  Their children were born between 1780 and 1800.  Several of their sons were named after political heroes of the time.  However, I can not find a Samuel Douglas in the time period.  William would have been a more likely name....after Rachel's father and husband.  

Yes, Samuel Douglas first appeared in Hawkins County as a witness to a will. He later married in Grainger County and then eventually moved to Warren County. All of this lends to the idea that he could have been the oldest son of William & Rachel. 

When I asked Ronald if there was a document naming Samuel Douglas Morrison's wife he said: 

Yes, his second wife was Anna Bragg

But there does not seem to be information about a first wife which is what I would want.  


Sunday, August 8, 2021

Spring Hill Cemetery

This blog post is written to have photos of the family members who are buried in Spring Hill Cemetery on the occasion of the Memorial Service for Sara Ann Sammons Hawkins.





Sara Ann Sammons Hawkins and Marshall Hawkins








Nora Beuhring Hawkins died at the age of 31 from complications from the birth of her second son,
Howard Burke Hawkins.  Almost certainly she died of infection that could now easily be treated with antibiotics as she did not die until July 15 and Pop Hawkins was born May 19.





Nora was called Bird.  



Jesse Marshall Hawkins
born 1866 in Louisa County, Virginia and died in 1939 in Huntington, WV





Below is photo of Jesse Marshall Hawkins with his daughter-in-law, Mary Ann McGregor Hawkins



Donald....I have nothing on Donald except stories.  When Bird died, Daisy took the baby, Howard in.  Her sister Mary Davis took Donald in.  Mary Beuhring Davis did not have an easy, happy life.  I would guess that Donald's life was not nearly so happy as that of Howard who was the baby in a happy home.

Mary Ann McGregor Hawkins




Howard Burke Hawkins 1899 -1980




Howard Burke Hawkins 
(1936-1992)

Blanche Poague Hawkins
(Second wife of Jesse Marshall Hawkins)
(1882-

We called her Nana.  Perhaps that is part of the reason that I chose that for my grandkids to call me Nana. 
She was such a really cute lady.  She was 16 years younger than Jesse Marshall Hawkins.  They married in 1907.  He would have been 41.   She would have been 25.  They never had children of their own. Marshall brought both of his sons back into his home when they married.  The boys were probably ...well Howard would have been about 8....I am not sure how old Donald was.  That must have been quite disruptive for everyone.  The story in the family was that Nana never learned how to boil water.  Blanche's parents moved the huge house that we knew and loved from fourth avenue to sit next door to their home.  Granddaddy Marshall always told fond stories about Nana and her parents.  I believe that he considered Blanche's parents to be grandparents to him.  Perhaps they taught him to play bridge?  Granny Mary called her Darling.  That perhaps tells you how the relationship was?  Why do I tell extra information for this lady who is not related by blood to us?  Well she does not have descendants to tell her story.






Luke McGregor Hawkins

Luke was a very special child.  Extremely brave!  We all loved him very much.



Henry Harrison Miller and Eliza Chapman Miller

H.H. Miller died in 1804 at the age of 90.  Eliza died in 1893, so she was already buried in this plot when her granddaughter, Bir








And this is the group that met at the cemetery to celebrate the lives of the people who came before
us and are buried in this plot of land:














CT, RI, NY and RI research

Somehow my genealogy always heats up in times when my real life is extraordinarly busy.   And that seems to be the case right now.  So I am going to make this blog about research that is of great interest to me....but my hours are too limited to give it the kind of time I wish for.  

Steve Roberts stopped by to return some books and our conversation included information about his Salmon ancestor who moved to the Barboursville area just before the Civil War.....perhaps an abolitionist who hoped to help in this area?  And the possibility that while Steve's ancestor seems much more "uptown" than my Salmons ancestors, there is the possibility that they were relate in the very early days of the Colonies.  Here is information that I wrote to Steve this morning,  


I looked on Ancestry and it seems that the public trees that go back earlier than my proven John Salmons in Cumberland County Virginia place the family in NY….long Island being one of the places that a William Salmon died in 1657.  My recent research on some Rhode Island ancestors show that during the War of King Philip many of these families moved to Long Island to escape the Indian atrocities happening in Rhode Island.  I would guess that that might have been happening in other parts of New England.  This would have been around 1676.  So this William Salmon would have been living on Long Island before the King Philip war.  Almost all of the public trees on Ancestry put my John Salmons’ ancestors as having lived in Suffolk County, NY…which is Long Island….But my newest research shows that there was a great deal of interaction between RI, CT and Long Island.  My Carpenter family seemed to have moved freely between the area around Providence RI and the part of Long Island that is directly across the Long Island Sound from Stamford, CT.   So I do not rule out the possibility that my own Salmons family could be related to your own.  But they certainly were not as up town as you describe your own ancestor.  They lived in the backwoods of Virginia and Kentucky for many generations.  Greg Hawkins lives in Westport.  You will see his town on the second map between Fairfield and Norwalk.  This is certainly a very interesting part of the world.  





Other things that are popping are the fact that FTDNA has their summer sale going on and I would like to buy kits for an male to male to male descendant of Phebe Hensley of Henry County, Virginia.

And the Elliott family is on a front burner because of the information from two or three researchers.  I wrote a blog post about this just a few days ago....and we are trying to use autosomal dna to prove the identity of John and Amanda Smith Elliott.  After  wrote the blog post I received message on the blog site from another researcher.  I want to spend more time on the.

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Elliott family


 Lauren, a fellow Elliot researcher, sent me an e-mail several days ago that has stirred my interest in my Elliott family.  She has done some extra research that I had never looked at.  She showed me a website in which the yDNA of our mutual Elliott family is explored.  WOW!  This opens up an entire new road of research!






Here is the URL if you want to look at if for yourself:

http://freepages.rootsweb.com/%7egallgaedhil/genealogy/haplo_elliotts.htm#U86SN


This looks like the John Elliott that others tell me is the ancestor of my well proven Jacob Elliott who moved his family to what is now Randolph County, NC in 1763.


1763, 11, 26.  Jacob (Ellott) & W& ch, Jacob, Elizabeth, Hannah, Israel & William rocf Warrington MM, Pa, dated 1763, 9, 20 (I have a copy of the original MM records for this) This is found in the records of New Garden MM in what is now Guilford County, NC.  It would have been Rowan County in 1763


Lauren shared with me the original document that she almost certainly found on Ancestry:


I just realized that this is not the document that my notes tell me that I have in my own collection.  What I meant to put here is the document that the Elliott family would have taken with them from Pennsylvana to their new home in what would have then been Rowan County, NC.  I will look for this document to add on a day when I have more time.  But I won't remove the below as it is excellent in giving dates of births of their children.  My own ancestor, Abraham, has not yet been born.





When I explore the yDNA site more, I find that there is more information that DEFINITELY sounds like my own well documented Elliott line:



I should explain that two Elliot  brothers moved to NC about the same time.  My Ancestor is Jacob Elliot who was definitely married to a woman named Elizabeth.  My data shows her as Elizabeth Moore, but I have no documentation nor proof for maiden name.  Jacob is my ancestor.  His brother is Abraham Elliott married to Priscilla Foulke.   After Priscilla died, Abraham married Sarah Pike who was the widow of William Piggot.  


It is Priscilla who was wife of Abraham when they made the move:


1765, 3, 30 Abraham, & w. Priscilla & ch Stephen, Ruth, John, Samey, Joseph, Abraham, Hester, & Jemima, rocf Warrington MM, Pa. dated 1764, 7, 14 endorsed by Cane Creek MM, NC 1765,1,5


Jacob was a very devout Quaker and his descendants remained Quaker for many generations. They moved with other Quakers into Lost Creek MM, Ohio and Indiana with the huge Quaker exodus out of the south and into the non-slave states of Ohio and Indiana.


One of my favorite genealogy stories can be found on my blog at below URL.  It tells how I know how very devout Jacob was.


http://marshamoses.blogspot.com/2012/08/nc-quaker-family-jacob-and-elizabeth.html


Looking at the above information I would guess that the yDNA participant who is explained in this second green box is from my Jacob and Elizabeth's son, William.  I have not done the research to know this to be true so I am just guessing.


There are at least two more yDNA participants in the chart at this URL who fall into the C haplogroup indicating that likely they are connected to my well proven line back to Jacob and Elizabeth, but I do not recognize them as quickly and am not adding them at this time.  My main goal today was to not lose the URL link for this information and to record my thoughts at this time.